Category: SEO

Growing as an SEO (3/4) – Training & Personal Development for SEOs

Growing as an SEO (3/4) – Training & Personal Development for SEOs

The previous two blog posts in this series talked about writing better job descriptions for SEO roles and levels and seniority for SEOs. In this blog post, I want to mostly talk about how to grow as an SEO: the fundamental part of this series, how do you get better, what do you grow in, but mostly what tools and resources do you have available.

“It’s not about resources, it’s about resourcefulness” – I’ll leave it up to you to Google who this quote is from. It’s not that hard, it’s a quote that hit me a few years ago. I felt I was stalling in a role and needed to move forward. There is so much that you can do yourself to advance your career and learn. That’s why I wanted to focus in this blog post on the things that I’ve used, and in most cases are still using to learn more about SEO.

I’ve tried to list as many different learning options as possible, in the end, everybody learns in a different way. It’s one of my favorite questions to ask in interviews what the best way is for people to learn. If they’re aware of what it is, it for sure adds a bonus point to the candidate.

Conferences & Meetups

While I was still living in Amsterdam, at some point I felt like that I didn’t miss any meetup related to online marketing in a while. I went to a ton of them, and they were great. There is so much to learn at an event: soft skills: networking, talking, socializing, small talk. All skills that are just as important (I’d argue even more important) than the on the job skills (crawling, technical, content, etc.).

Blogs

So let’s give you a selection of the blogs that I’ve been following over the years that helped me build my SEO knowledge. These are some of the ones on the list (read: it’s far from complete, I’ll keep updating the list with specific SEO blogs).

Mentors/Coffee/Twitter/Hero(ins)

Follow people, follow experts. You can learn so much from the approach from that other people are taking. Just to get a different insight or to learn a new tool. SEO is a rich field where everybody has their own tactics and I feel strongly that every week I pick up on some new tactics in SEO that I’ve never thought of (mostly around research or authority building). We can’t know everything but it’s a good tactic.

Talk to people, they can tell & learn you more. I’ve asked people at companies that I admire for years if I could have coffee with them. If you’re reading this and one of them, I thank you again!
Don’t ask for trade secrets, but if you do your research it will strengthen the conversation. So let’s expand a little bit on that …

Research

After I’ve just mentioned that having coffee is great to learn more, but make sure you come prepared. As we’re talking about SEO, run an audit. Ask them why they’ve done certain things this way. I’ve learned a great deal just analyzing and researching the best sites trying to figure out what their SEO strategies are after which I got that confirmed by their teams while having coffee with them. I’m not telling this to brag about it, but to give you an insight into what you can do to get more out of the meeting too. It will strengthen the conversation. You’re using somebody’s time and she or he will likely appreciate it if you know what they’re talking about in more detail.

Creating Playbooks / Keeping track

Recently I shared for the first time the idea behind building a playbook in a presentation that I gave at a conference. It’s something that I’ve actually been doing for a few years now. For about a five years now I’ve been saving job descriptions, not of jobs that I wanted to be hired for (at least mostly not). But Marketing roles that I thought I was going to hire one day or grow into. They’re a great archive (I have close to 200!) these days for whenever I need to fill a specific role.

But the same methodology applies to most parts of somebodies work, most content teams have a style guide, when you’re working in CRO you have templates to document and hypothesize your experiments. But I felt that most of these ‘standards’ were missing across functions within Marketing and specifically (in-house) SEO teams.

What’s missing?

What other tools are out there for others to use as well? What learning options have I missed and should I add to the post? Leave a comment here or on Twitter: @MartijnSch and I’ll make sure to keep this post updated, just like the others.

Growing as an SEO – This series

In this series I’ve also blogged about:

Growing as an SEO (2/4) – Levels & Seniority in SEO Roles

Growing as an SEO (2/4) – Levels & Seniority in SEO Roles

Since I’ve joined RVshare, I needed to think a lot about these questions (again): what people do I need to hire? What experience level do they need to be at? This made me reflect back on hiring for my teams at Postmates and The Next Web and my views on different levels in certain functions. As my background is, mostly, in SEO I started to think about what levels I would form within a big SEO team and what their differences are. This is my first attempt at this framework and part of the series about growing as an SEO, the previous blog post talked about how to write a proper job description for an SEO role.

In this blog post I want to talk more about the different seniority levels, what do they mean? What kind of role are you looking for: specialist or generalist? What level are they at? And what kind of levels do you need for your own team and what might be the different responsibilities for the different roles and how do they change (over time).

Generalist versus Specialist

Are you a smaller or bigger company and how big is your SEO team? What are you really looking for on your team? What is your own background? Do you know enough about SEO yourself to successfully guide & lead an SEO person?

You’ve probably heard of the idea behind a T-shaped role. Do you expect somebody to know a lot in one specific area (specialist) or do you want that person also to know a lot about the other areas that have a relation with SEO. This visual is just the tip of the iceberg o other skills that you can expect from an SEO.

Generalist

I started myself as a generalist in my career, like most people. Back then, Springest had a need for traffic acquisition and I worked on their SEO, Affiliate Marketing and later on their Paid Acquisition (mainly Adwords). Next, to that, I worked a lot with Google Analytics to learn more about the keywords that were driving performance (this was before ‘not provided’ got introduced).

Mostly in smaller organizations, I see marketing leaders or founders hire for this type of person. In most companies, you early on need somebody to test the waters for all the channels and need to be able to manage more than just one thing. SEO isn’t usually the fastest growing channel for a company as it takes a while. That has a huge impact on why there aren’t a ton of people with a dedicated focus on SEO in most startups.

Specialist

Later on, when I left Springest and joined The Next Web I was much more of a specialist. I focused solely on SEO, although later on, I added analytics and CRO (all before I lead their Marketing team). This meant that I needed to be proficient in all the areas that were part of SEO: technical SEO, content (we had tons of editors to work with) and figure out how to build out our authority at a big scale. All this type of work was very much only focused on SEO and didn’t have much impact on other channels.

Most SEO roles these days that I see are similar, they’re usually part of a digital marketing team and/or are the only person on the team with a dedicated focus on SEO to help that channel. They have often contact with a product manager. Marketing manager and the needed people focused on content, design, and development. But they’re the ones driving the specific roadmap for SEO.

Individual Contributor (IC) & Management (M) Roles

Not everybody is a generalist or a specialist, neither is everybody a manager or wants to focus on just one discipline. But for most people, it makes sense to belong to a specific ladder.

Individual Contributor Roles in SEO

With most companies, you’ll start at the bottom of the totem pole when you start your career in SEO. Most people will start right around the title of SEO Associate or SEO Specialist at the beginning of their career and work their way up the ladder. After a while, most of them will need to make the decision to either continue to be an Individual Contributor (IC) or move into the role of manager where they start managing (or better: leading) people.

  • SEO Internship: We all need to build up experience and what better way to do that than with an internship/apprenticeship. This role will usually get the support of the SEO team while you learn how SEO works. Most people that I’ve seen enter this role have a passion for online marketing and are studying something in a related field (or totally not, sometimes even better). You’re never long in this role (at most 5 months), you either tend to like or not so you can move up on the SEO ladder.
  • SEO Associate: In some cases, this role comes in between an internship and having the title SEO Specialist. This usually happens within enterprises where you’re dealing with bigger SEO teams. There is not a ton of difference between the role of an SEO Specialist and the SEO Associate. But usually, SEO specialists tend to have a little bit more of experience (1-2 years as a maximum). They’re starter positions and sometimes the titles are intertwined.
  • (Senior) SEO Specialist: For most people, this is where they’ll start, the SEO Specialist. I’ve been and done there myself when I joined TNW this was my job title. I was the only person on the Marketing & Sales department dealing with SEO and was answering to the (at the time) CMO. This meant that I was working on all the aspects of SEO and was working with a development. When you’re getting more experience and depending on the size of the organization and HR structure it could be that you get the title Senior SEO Specialist after a while to claim the more experience that you have.
  • (Senior) SEO Manager: You’re growing, you’re basically now sort of managing the SEO process and you’re not answering usually to somebody who’s leading the SEO team anymore. You’re the one in charge of SEO but you’re not leading anybody specifically on the SEO team itself.
  • (Senior) Head of SEO: The highest level that I usually see on SEO teams as an Individual Contributor. It makes it that you’re not managing other people but work deeply on SEO and have the fundamental knowledge and resources around you to manage the whole process from start to finish. There isn’t a ton of companies that I know that are able to support this role as in most companies they’ll require you to become a manager.

Management Roles in SEO

Some people chose to go the route of the manager, they want to lead a team and be responsible for multiple people. This is where management & leadership skills are becoming more important as they’re not working 100% of their time hands-on on SEO anymore.

  • SEO Team Lead: This role likely makes sense by reading the job title. You’re part of a small SEO team and you’re the lead. I like to apply this seniority level on a team when it’s small and the ‘manager’ isn’t very experienced yet as a leader. It’s usually the case when they have moved over from the level of SEO Specialist and you decide to hire another SEO Specialist. Somebody has to lead the wolf pack and decide on a strategy. If the 1st SEO person has the ambition to step over to a more managerial role over time, this is a good start.
  • (Senior) SEO Manager: You’re managing the SEO team and you work with some people outside your own team to get things done. Usually, the case when you’re part of a bigger Growth or Marketing team and you’re the one deciding on what work is important to help the bigger team achieve its goals.
  • Director of SEO: You can strategically think about SEO and you’re part of a bigger organization. That’s what my last title was at Postmates. Our overall Growth organization of which we were part of was around 50 people and we had multiple Directors of different functions (Growth Product, Growth Engineering, Paid Acquisition, etc.) report into our VP of Growth. You lead a team that can also work cross-functionally with other teams within and outside the same group.
  • VP of SEO: Likely the highest seniority title that I’ve seen in SEO for in-house was that of VP of SEO. There are a few companies, mainly in the United States, that use that title. They’re enterprise companies (in all cases that I’ve seen at least). Where they differ from a Director of SEO role is that they’re focused on the bigger picture. They lead a team that is usually  1.5-2 times as big as the level lower and are responsible for just more than SEO. A position like this is usually also heavily involved in functions like Public Relations, Brand Marketing, and Content Creation depending on where that might live in the rest of the organization.

‘Global … Head of SEO’ – Global companies & reflecting this on titles

Through Twitter (@micahfk) reached out, with a good point about the title: “Global Head of SEO”. I’ve seen this level a few times myself as well and I agree with his point that this title can in most cases have more weight than a title on a Director level. In companies at scale, there will be a global team managing all of the enterprises’ SEO strategy where on the local level (usually countries or regions) teams will work on the local execution (and often strategy). They’ll have similar titles, but usually, the people who will head up a Global team will rank higher on the organizational chart.


This framework is simplified and not perfect. It’s a first shot at assessing what roles there are in an SEO function from an in-house point of view. As I’ve never worked with/for an agency I’m sure their views on this would be different, I won’t blog about that. It’s up for grabs for somebody who has extensively worked on that side of the fence.

Work in Progress: This blog post is a work in progress. I hope to extend it over the upcoming weeks with more information on the responsibilities and areas that the different roles work on.

Growing as an SEO

In this series I’ve also blogged about:

Why & What alerts in SEO are becoming more important

Last updated on June 5th, 2018 at 04:18 pm

We have all been there, haven’t we? Quotes like: “SH*T, my sitemaps are broken”, “I have no-indexed half my pages” or: “I have been kicked out of a search engine with way too many pages” sound familiar? Honestly, I can’t blame you. It’s getting harder and harder to keep track of all the changes that are being made regarding SEO on your site and you’re likely the only person involved with SEO for your company while also trying to work on driving traffic through other channels. So let me give you a quick insight in what I am usually tracking within bigger companies and where there is an actual team to react on issues that come up.

Continue reading “Why & What alerts in SEO are becoming more important”

Growing as an SEO (1/4) – Writing better Job Descriptions for SEO Roles

Growing as an SEO (1/4) – Writing better Job Descriptions for SEO Roles

Last updated on October 24th, 2018 at 02:39 am

Writing a resume isn’t fun (IMHO) and writing job descriptions is probably even less fun. Over the last years I’ve written many of them, usually following a similar template that would help us define what the role is about. Which isn’t always a good thing, depending on the seniority of the role you want to make sure you use the right approach to hire and make it as personal as possible. Which usually makes for better hiring, most of my best hires came through my network of people I was at least ware of. Over the last months I’ve received many requests if I wanted to take a look at an SEO job description, if I knew people that were looking for a job and wanted to share it with my network, you get it. But what I started noticing is that most SEO job descriptions are incredibly generic and don’t really seem inviting too many people.

“We’re looking for somebody to set up or SEO strategy, we’re looking for somebody to work with our engineering and design team to create content. You’ll pick the right keywords for us to focus on”. Yada yada yada. You’ve seen and heard it all before. Obviously when you’re on a job search in SEO you’ll come across all of these requirements and responsibilities easily. But I think companies need to do better, definitely in an area like Silicon Valley, to hire the right SEO talent or to get them even interested. There isn’t that many of us, but the information you give ‘us’ isn’t always great. That got me thinking on what information should be mentioned in job descriptions for SEOs. But I also wanted to take a look at what job descriptions look like right now:

Saving job descriptions

I must admit, I have a weird obsession, if I see well written (or really poor) job descriptions, for whatever type of role in digital, growth, marketing, you name it, I have a tendency to save them (in Evernote). Over the years that has build up to a nice archive (150+ JDs) that I can use for writing new job descriptions that I’ve used for hiring. The list of 16+ companies that are amongst them: Airbnb, Uber, Groupon, Booking, Zillow, Hulu, Porch, Tesla and the descriptions range from SEO Assistants to more senior positions like Senior Director of SEO. Fill that up with all the job descriptions that you can easily find on most job sites (LinkedIn, Glassdoor) and you can get a good enough understanding of what managers + recruiters are thinking about while sourcing/hiring for SEO roles.

Almost unfortunately, Postmates didn’t have a job description for me. As my previous boss asked me to fill this need within the Growth team, otherwise I would have loved to share that original one.

What companies are looking for?

It doesn’t exist, even when you’re in the right position and you might be able to write your own job description. But most of them have some issues, so I decided to look at all the SEO job descriptions that I could find and see if there are any patterns in what companies are looking for. So let’s look at the two main areas of job descriptions:

Responsibilities

Tag clouds are good for something I guess, that’s why I just threw in all the requirements for a dozen job descriptions and these were the main keywords that came up in the tagcloud. Some of the ones that stood out for me:

    • Performance: This keyword was interesting to me so I did some digging on the context, I expected it to be a requirement to know about performance marketing. Turns out the overwhelming majority of companies wants better performance reporting around their SEO strategy.
    • Content: People in SEO need to have a solid understanding of content, know how to create it and maybe even more important, know how to improve it.
    • Technical: Guess what, these days SEOs need to be technical. As most of the job descriptions are from Bay Area companies, that doesn’t surprise me at all considering that the work with product managers (or in some orgs are even PMs) and engineers most of the day. This is also important regarding technical audits that are usually performed inhouse.
    • Strategies/Initiatives: SEOs need to be able to make strategic decisions. For most companies they’re one of the people working on usually the biggest traffic channel for the site so they need to be able to think strategic as they can make changes to a platform that have a bigger impact than just SEO.
    • Team(s): They either need to be great working in teams (aka teamplayer) and in the more senior positions they need to be great at building up their own teams, or building out.

Missing?

While analyzing this there were a few things that I was missing that I thought were interesting so at least I wanted to mention them.

  • Agencies: A good portion of SEOs that I know work with agencies, but there was barely a mention in job descriptions about working with agencies, finding them, etc.
  • ASO: Most companies that I went through had mobile apps, but ASO was never really part of the job description.

Requirements / Qualifications

  • Experience in SEO: For starter roles this is usually not a requirement, as they can only have experience with the work that they’ve done on the side and not in an actual job/company.
  • Experience in Analysis: Most SEOs needs to be at least familiar on a basic level with a web analytics tool like Google Analytics, Omniture, Adobe Analytics so they can analyze their performance (one of the core responsibilities).
  • Tools: Often I see experience with Google Search Console being mentioned, but I’d love to see more companies mention the other tools in their toolset too. In the end you won’t share that much information with your competition by telling them what tools you’re using.
  • Delivering results: Although you can’t guarantee that your work will help you need to be able to show the progress that you’ve made on other sites and the work that you’ve done there. If it didn’t result in an uplift, at least you’re able to provide answers on the why not and what your original hypothesis was.

Missing?

What I feel is missing in the list of requirements & qualifications is a few things, what about the setup that you already have, or are they diving into a new field of opportunity. Are you going to expand your business, are you operating in new niches? For some companies the future manager will already know what projects (s)he wants work to be done for.

  • Tools? What is your current toolset, if somebody has exceptional expertise with a certain tool that for sure would help. Anybody can learn more about a tool, but experience is important too.
  • How often have they played ‘this’ game before? How many sites have you worked on, what was the scale/business model of the sites? I have way more experience then on average with publishers and marketplace models then probably other SEOs. While somehow I have barely worked for ecommerce sites and SaaS companies thus far. This also gives better insights if they have a certain ‘play book’ on how to approach certain issues.

Writing the Ultimate Job Description

I’m on a journey to change the world. OK slowly. And one by one. But I believe we can do better, making people find the right jobs will make them happier and increase the productivity and output for the company. The first step to get that started would be to improve job descriptions so people have a better idea on what they’re getting into then setting up a very generic one. Not all bullet points will apply to every job description, but you likely get the point:

Responsibilities

  • Define the SEO strategy: we’re wanting to grow (X metric) with approximately XX% this year. SEO is one of the channels that we depend on, so we’re looking for somebody who could build out the channel after an intensive audit and figure out what opportunities we really have.
  • Reporting: be able to use our analytics infrastructure to dive into customer & traffic data to find new insights and opportunities for us to grow SEO as a traffic channel.
  • Reporting Up: be able to talk to our stakeholders and peers in the company about the performance and opportunities that you see within SEO. Be able to communicate the results of the work that we‘ve done.
  • Analytical: be analytical and data driven, are you able to write SQL and work with large amounts of data? Great! We have some of our analysts ready to work with you in supporting the insights that you need to gather.
  • Technical: we have developers ready to work with you, so it would help if you could code and be able to explain in detail what your wishes are for implementations regarding SEO and new features.
  • Content: we’ve been wanting to create & produce more and better content. It would be great if you have worked with copywriters and are able to take our blog & content marketing efforts to the next level. We have copywriters that we work with and also our PR specialists.
  • Build out the team: be a team leader and builder. Currently the team is 2 people that will be supporting you, but we hope to build out the team with your support. So we’d like to see experience leading people & teams.
  • Performance: you need to be able to identify opportunities, build out the resources needed and along the way have a ton of fun while always striving for better results.

Requirements / Qualifications

  • You have X years working experience in online/digital marketing and you know what channels are important for our type of business to be successful.
  • You have worked on (multiple) big sites regarding SEO before, it is important to us that you can show experience building out a strategy for a bigger site (50.000+ pages).
  • You have worked with web analytics tools and understand how you can use these insights to further improve user experience and optimize pages for search engines. Preferred tools would be: Google Analytics, Amplitude Analytics, Adobe Analytics, …, etc..
  • Do you have experience writing or have worked with copywriters before, great! This will help push forward our ideas on content marketing.
  • You have experience managing different products/projects at the same time, our teams are divided between products/projects and some are cross functional (designers, engineers).
  • You have worked before with tools that we already have in our toolset: Google Search Console, Bing Webmaster Tools, Majestic SEO, Screaming Frog, … , etc. but you’re free to look into other SEO tools (up to enterprise budget) and evaluate needs for our organization.

This is not even good enough but hopefully a good start, in the job descriptions that I usually write I also try to give insights into the company, mention what the team looks like and what the perks & benefits are of the role. But most important what type of person we’re looking for and how we think this role will help the bigger team grow & support. In the end it’s a two way stream and we want to make that clear from the start. You need somebody’s skills but you also want them to feel welcome and appreciated!

What’s missing?

What do you think is really missing in job descriptions these days that should be reflect. What are you looking for in a next or first SEO role? Let me know, I’d love this post to become the ultimate SEO job description for the rest of the world. Hit me up on @MartijnSch on Twitter for feedback!

Growing as an SEO

In this series I’ve also blogged about:

Sitemaps; Setup, Monitoring & Metrics for Analysis

Sitemaps; Setup, Monitoring & Metrics for Analysis

Last updated on March 20th, 2018 at 05:14 pm

In my effort to write longer posts on a specific topic I thought it was time to shed some light on something that we’ve been working on during the last months at Postmates and something that I never thought of as a topic that could become interesting: sitemaps. They’re pretty boring in itself, it’s a technology where you give search engines basically all the URLs for a site, that you want them to know about (indexed) and you take it from there. Even more so, as most sites these days run on a CMS like WordPress where tons of plugins can take care of this for you. Don’t get me wrong, do use them if you are on one! But as I work mainly for companies that don’t have a ‘standard’ CMS I worked multiple times on creating sitemaps and having their integrations work flawless. Over time that taught me a ton of things and recently we discovered that certain additional features in the process can help speed up the process. That’s why I think it was time to write a detailed essay on sitemaps ;). (*barf: definitive guide).

TLDR; How can sitemaps help you get better insights, how to set them up?

  1. Sitemaps will provide you with insights on what pages are submitted and which ones are indexed.
  2. You create create sitemap files by uploading XML or TXT files with dumps of URLs
  3. All your different content on pages can be added to sitemaps: images, video, news.
  4. Different fields for priority, last modified and frequency can give search engines insights in the priority for certain URLs to be crawled.
  5. Create multiple sitemaps with segments of pages, for example by product category.
  6. Add your sitemap index file to your robots.txt so it’s easy to find for a search engine.
  7. Submit your sitemap and ping sitemap files to search engines for quick discovery.
  8. Make sure all URLs in your sitemaps are working and returning a 200 status code, think twice: do you all want them to be discovered?
  9. Monitor your data and crawls through log files and Google Search Console.

Goals

When you start working on sitemaps there is a few things to keep in mind. The ideas that you have around them and the goal: what problem that you have are they solving? For small sitemaps (100 pages) I’m honestly not sure if I would support sitemaps. There is probably a lot of other projects that would have more impact on SEO/the business.

If you’re thinking about setting up sitemaps there is a few goals that it will help you accomplish:

  • Get better insights into what pages are valuable to your site.
  • Provide search engines with the URLs that you want them to index, the fastest way to submit pages at scale.

Overall this means that you want to support the best sitemap infrastructure you can as that will help you get the best insights ever, the quickest way to get these insights and most of all get your pages indexed + submitted as fast as possible.

Setup

Sitemap

Format? XML/Text? Does the format matter, for most companies probably not as they’re using a plugin to support their sitemaps. If you want to go more advanced and get better insights I would go with the XML format myself. From time to time we’re using text file sitemaps where we just dump all the URLs. They’ll help in getting you a sitemap quick and dirty if you don’t have the time or resources quickly.

Types: There are multiple formats for sitemaps to support different content types.

  • Pages: In there you’ll dump all the actual URls that you have on the site and that you want a search engine to know about. You can add images for these specific pages to that Schema as well to ensure that the search engine understands what images are an important part of the page.
  • Images: For both image search as making an impact with the pages you can add sitemaps for images.
  • Videos: Video sitemaps used to have a bigger impact back in the days as the video listings were a more prominent part of the search results page. These days you mostly want to let search engine know about them as they’re usually part of an individual page.
  • News: News is not really its own format as they’re just individual pages. But Google News sitemaps do have their own format. Creating a News Sitemap – Google.
  • HREFLang: This is not really a type of content but it’s still important to think about. If your pages have a translated version, you want to make sure they’re being listed as the ‘duplicate’ version of that. Read more information about that here in Google’s support.

Fields

  • Frequency: Does the page change on a regular basis? Some pages are going to be dynamic and will always change. But for some of them they will change only daily, weekly, monthly. It’s likely worth it to include this as a good signal in combination with the Last Modified field and the header.
  • Last Modified: We do want to let a search engine know what kind of pages have been updated/modified and which ones aren’t. That’s why I’d always recommend to organizations that they should include this in their sitemap. In combination with the Last Modified header, we’ll talk about that in the next step it will be a good enough signal to assess if the page has been modified or not.
  • Priority: This is a field that I wouldn’t spend too much time thinking about. On multiple occasions, Google has mentioned that they don’t put any value or effort into understand this field. Some plugins use it and it won’t hurt. But for custom setups it’s not something that I would recommend adding.

Last Modified

Has the actual sitemap changed since the last time it’s been generated? Yes or No? In some cases your sitemap won’t change. You didn’t add any new products/articles. Have you ever run this in your terminal:

curl -I https://www.example.com/sitemap/sitemap_index.xml

Look at the headers, if you see a Last Modified header, it will be a signal to see when the page has been last modified. We use it to tell the last time it was updated. We combine this with serving a Last Modified Header at the URLs that are in the sitemaps. Sometimes this won’t always work as pages can change momentarily (based on availability of products for example).

Segmenting Pages

For better insights it’s really useful to segment your sitemaps. The limit per sitemap is in the end 50.000 URLs, but there is basically not a required minimum. The way you’ll see sitemaps being segmented is in multiple ways. Based on these you can get more segmented insights, is 1 category of pages better indexed then another one.

Categories: Most companies that I work with are segmenting there pages by the categories they’ve defined themselves. This could be based on region or for example by product categories for an ecommerce site.

Static Pages: Something that most people with custom build sites don’t realize is that there is usually still a ton of pages that aren’t backed up by a database that you you want insights on too. Think about: contact, homepage, about us, services, etc. List all these pages in a different sitemap (static_sitemap.xml) and include this file in your sitemap index too.

Sitemap Index

If you have multiple sitemaps (10-25+) you want to look into creating a sitemap index file, with this you can just submit 1 file and with that the search engine will be able to find all the underlying files that are part of the sitemap. This saves you adding multiple sitemap URLs to Google Search Console/Bing Webmaster Tools and will also give you the ability to add only 1 line to your robots.txt file. In the end it’s another sitemap technically which lists all the different URLs of the other sitemaps.

Robots.txt

You want to make sure that on first entry a search engine will know about your sitemaps. Usually one of the first files a search engines’ crawler will look at is the robots.txt file as it needs to know what it can/can’t look at on a site. As we just talked about the sitemap index, we’re going to list that one in the robots.txt file for your site which should live on https://www.domain.com/robots.txt. It’s just as simple as adding this one line to it:

Sitemap: https://www.domain.com/sitemap/sitemap_index.xml

Obviously the URL can be different based on where you have hosted your sitemap index file.

GZIP

If you’re a big site you likely have servers that won’t go down and can take quite a hit but if you have extensive sitemap files they could easily get up to +50MB that is not a file transfer that can be done in a matter of two seconds. Also it can just slow down things on both your end and the end of the search engine. That’s why we’ve started GZipping our sitemap files to make for a faster download and speed up that process, at the same time you make it 1 step more complicated for people to copy paste your data.

PING Search Engines

Guess what, it has an affect. I thought it was crazy too, but we found a tiny bit of proof that actually pinging a search engine will result in something. As you mostly will likely only care about Google and Bing we still have a way of letting them know about a page:

Submit your sitemap

Probably not worth explaining, you need to make sure that you can get insights into your XML sitemaps and the URLs that are listed in there. So make sure to submit your sitemaps to Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools.

Pubsubhubbub

One of the projects that is very unknown is the PubSubHubbub project, it will let, mostly publishers, be instantly notified (through a specific push protocol) when new URLs are published in a feed. This protocol works through an ATOM feed (do you still know about that protocol?) that you provide. Once you have registered the feed with the right services you can make it easier for them to be notified of new pages.

XSLT

XML Sitemaps aren’t easy to read for a regular person. If you’re not familiar with the format of XML it might be uncomfortable. Luckily a while back people invested XSLT. This will let you ‘style’ the output of XML files to something that is more readable. This would make it easier to see certain elements in the sitemaps that you’ve listed. If you want to make them more readable I would advise looking into: https://www.w3schools.com/xml/xsl_intro.asp.

Quality Signals

Search engines like sites that are of high quality. The pages are the best, the URLs are always working and your site never goes down. Chances are high that all of this doesn’t always apply to your sitemaps as some pages might not be great. Some things to consider when you’re working on this:

  • 301/302/404: Are all URLs in your sitemap responding like they should with a 200 response? In the best case scenario none of your URLs should be responding with another response code then that. In reality most sitemaps always contain some errors.
  • NoIndex: Have you included URLs in your sitemap that are actually excluded by a noindex meta tag or header? Make sure that it’s not the case.
  • Robots.txt: An even bigger problem, are you telling the search engine about URLs that you actually don’t want them to look at?
  • Canonical Pages: Is the actual URL that you’re listing the canonical URL/original URL or are you listing the pages that are still ‘stealing’ the content from another page, like a filter page. Do you really want to list these URLs in your sitemap?

With all of these signals, some might have a big/small impact others won’t matter at all. But at least think about the implications that they might have when you’re building out your sitemaps.

Airflow

Lately I’ve been working a ton with Apache Airflow, it’s the framework that we use at Postmates, invented by the great folks at Airbnb and mostly use for dealing with data pipelines. You want to do X, if X succes you want it to go on to task Y. We’re using that for the generation of sitemaps, if we can generate all sitemaps we want to have them pinged with the search engines, if that succeeds we want to run some quality scripts, if that is done we want to be notified on both email and Slack to tell us at what time the script succeeded.

For some sitemaps we want it to run everyday, for a specific segment we want to have it run on an hourly basis. The insights from Airflow will give us the details to see if it’s failing or not and will notify us when it succeeds/fails. With this setup, we have constant monitoring in place to ensure that sitemaps are being generated daily/hourly.

Monitoring

Eventually you only want to know if your pages are of good enough quality that they’re being indexed by the search engine. So let’s see how can see this in Google Search Console.

Index coverage

A useful report in Google Search Console is the Index Status report (Google Index > Index Status). It will show for the property that you’ve added how many pages have been indexed and what pages have been crawled. As the main goal for a sitemap is driving up the number of pages being submitted for the Google index the following step is making sure that they’re being indexed. This report will give you that first high level overview.

Sitemap Validation: Errors & Amount of URLs

But what about the specifics of the sitemap, are the URLs being crawled properly and are the URLs being submitted to the index. The sitemap reports give you this level of detail (in this case 98% is indexed, which makes sense, the 2% missing are some products that were test ones that Google seemed to have ignored, luckily!). Remember what we talked about before regarding segmenting your pages? If you would have done that you would have seen in this particular example what percent of pages in that sitemap was submitted / indexed. Very useful if you work on big sites where the internal link structure for example is lacking and you want to push that. These reports can (they not always) give you insights into what the balance could be between them.

Quality Assurance

  • Are the URLs working (200 status code)? An unknown fact, but Google doesn’t like following redirects or finding broken URLs in your sitemaps. Spend some time on making sure that these pages aren’t in there or add the right monitoring to prevent it from happening. Since we’ve starting Gzipping our sitemaps that’s become a tiny bit harder as you first need to unpack them. But for quality testing we still have scripts in place that on demand can run a crawl of the sitemap to see if all URLs in there are valid.
  • Page Quality: Honestly, is this page really worth it to be indexed in Google? Some pages are just not of the quality that they should be and so sometimes you should take that into account when building up sitemaps. Did you filter out the right pages?

Metrics & Analysis

So far we’ve talked about the whole setup and how to monitor results. Let’s go a little step further before we close this subject and look at the information in log files. It’s a topic that I became more familiar with and have worked closely with over the last months too:

Log Files

As log files can be stored on the web server that you’re also using for your regular pages you can get additional insights into how often your sitemaps are being viewed and if there are any issues with sitemaps. As we work on them on a regular basis it could be that they break. That’s why we make sure that for example we monitor the status codes for the URLs so that we can see when a certain sitemap doesn’t hit a successful 200 status code.

Proving that pinging works

A while back we started to ping our sitemaps to Google and Bing, both make it clear (Google) that if you have an existing sitemap and you want to resubmit it this is a good way to do it. This sounds weird, Google got rid of their ‘submit a URL’ feature for the index years ago. So we were skeptic to see if this had any impact. As it was really easy to implement, you just fire a GET request to a Google URL with the sitemap URL in there. What we noticed is that we saw Google almost immediately try to look at these URLs. As we refresh this specific sitemap every hour, we also ping it every hour to Google. Guess what happens, every hour for the last weeks they look at the sitemap by now. Who says you can’t influence crawlers? Result? If you want to ensure that Google is actually looking at a page and actively crawling it, pinging seems to prove that, that is actually happening.

Screenshot of this from a Kibana dashboard where we log server requests

What if you can’t ping? Usually I would only recommend pinging a search engine if your whole sitemap generation process is fully automated, it doesn’t make sense to open your browser or have a tiny script for this. If you still want to basically experience the same, use the Resubmit button in Google Search Console > Sitemaps to achieve the same.

Future

This is not all of it and I’ve gone over some topics briefly, I didn’t want to document everything as there’s already a ton of information from Google and other sites about how you can specifically setup sitemaps. In my case, we’re on a route to figure out how we can make our sitemap setup near perfect, what I’m still wanting to investigate or analyze:

  • Adding a Last Modified Header to pages in the sitemap, what is the effect of pinging a sitemap and Google looking at all pages or just the ones that are modified?
  • Segmenting them even further, let’s say I only add 100/1000 pages to a sitemap and start creating just more of them, does that influence crawling, do we get better insights?

Resources

You want to learn more about sitemaps, look into the following resources to learn more about the concept, the idea behind it and the technical specification:

Next steps?

When I started writing I didn’t plan to have this become everything I know about sitemaps. But what did I miss? What optimizations can we apply to sitemaps in order to get better insights, speed up the crawling of pages. This is just one of the areas of technical SEO but probably an important one if you’re looking for deeper insights into what Google or Bing think about your site. If you have questions or comments, feel free to give a shout on Twitter: @MartijnSch

Dealing with SEO within your company / internally

Dealing with SEO within your company / internally

Last updated on March 16th, 2018 at 07:30 pm

“My company/manager/CEO doesn’t understand SEO, my engineers have no idea on how to implement X, I don’t get the buy-in that I need.” Just some of the comments that I hear in real life and see pass by on Twitter. That’s why in late 2017 I asked this question on Twitter. So that’s why I thought it would be time for a write up on the scenarios that I’ve seen over the last few years in SEO and the other ways that I’ve seen that help for getting input. I’ll try to share some insights into how I’m/we’re dealing with explaining and dealing with SEO internally.

Is there any believe in SEO?

For a successful SEO strategy and great results the first thing that you’ll need is somebody in the organization needs to support SEO. If that person or role isn’t there it’s going to be really hard to get things moving forward. But how do you know that support is there. In my case I’ve been lucky, my first job at Springest I had a guy who started a SEO agency himself, TNW was such a big online tech player I didn’t even need to explain what SEO was and these days at Postmates I got specifically asked if I wanted to focus on SEO when I joined. All with the believe that SEO would help move the business forward. But in the end you don’t always need to have people that know what SEO is and know everything inside out. It will help if they’re able to help you out when you have questions of SEO and at least know the good and bad parts about it. If the person that’s asking you to help out is also talking about link buying I would probably reconsider my decisions to work for them a few times  (and probably decide not to).

Explaining the value

In most organizations you’re going to need to explain the value of SEO, in the end it remains a black/dark grey box in which it’s hard to explain what kind of impact you can deliver on. But what you can explain in my opinion is the following:

  • What is the opportunity, how big is your industry/nice in terms of search volume?
  • What is our current position? How good/bad are we performing against our competition?
  • Who’s our competition really? It’s most likely not the companies that offer the same product but probably the ones that are beating your *ss in the search results.
  • Increase conversion rate while they’re at it, increase awareness while they’re at it, increase referral traffic while they’re at it.

These are just a few that additional values that you can bring to the table as an SEO (team) in a company. Most of all, if you do a great job on keyword research you can tell your internal organization a lot about the keywords and intent of the users within your industry/niche.

But how do you proceed, to excel even more. In the end you want your whole organization to be supportive and help the cause of SEO. The more people that work on it the more you can hopefully grow your visibility and with that your relevant business metrics (clicks, leads, sign ups, etc.).

Creating Buy In

What kind of support do you need, why do you need it and what can you do to get it? Let’s talk a little bit about that:

Team Support

Does your team know what SEO is, how it can help the company and what their contribution to it could be/mean? Very often I don’t see SEOs talk with the IT team/engineers/developers or whatever job title they’ll have in your organization. The often talked about phrase: “Sometimes you should just have a beer with them to build up a good relation” most often is incorrect. You’ll build up a better relationship, that I agree with. But that doesn’t always cover an actual understanding of the problem which is still going to be essential.

Building up understanding on what you’re/they’re working on

Does your boss, his boss and the CEO what you work on for SEO? Pretty sure that they don’t. So it’s not surprising that you don’t have all the support or resources that you would need. Start educating them, on what you’re working on and what the results are. If you’re in doubt about something there are multiple paths to go: run an experiment, launch an MVP as soon as possible or create the business case/technical documentation so you’re aware that you know what you’re building.

My {fill in random job title} doesn’t understand SEO

“Why didn’t my engineer think of adding redirects?”, “Why didn’t our content team use the right keywords?”, “Why doesn’t my boss understand what SEO is really about?”. Questions that you must have asked yourself and I can’t blame you. But the answer to all of them is easy: “Because you haven’t told them”. In the end all these things matter to SEO and your success, so why don’t you explain it once more. Repetition makes it easier to have these answers printed on their minds.

What can help me build up an understanding of SEO?

Besides working with your team it’s even more important to work in a nice way with the other teams in a company. It’s very likely that there are more people outside of SEO in your company then there are working with it on a daily basis. All of these folks can help you out with SEO too. I remember the times where I was in desperate need for a copywriter after hiring dramas that continued for months and our receptionist turned out to be an English major and able to help out immediately.

Internal Decks/Meeting

The previous two companies that I’ve worked for were relatively small (<75) and as I was an ‘early’ employee at both I saw a lot of people come in. In the end that made it easier to explain SEO to them as I either hired them or they had a manager that I already worked with within the organization. At Postmates that is quite different, I came in years after founding the company at the point where we had over 400+ people and a growing organization.

That’s why early on, when I was formulating the SEO strategy I started creating a slide deck explaining SEO for the rest of the organization and also telling them more about the projects that we already worked on or would be working on in the next months. Whenever a new team would be formulated or somebody would join the Growth team I tried to keep up with setting up a meeting with them and seeing if there would be any overlap or room to work together. In the end your Comms teams, Support teams have probably some interest in SEO or you can help them with their work with the tools, resources and/or products that you have available.

Weekly Status Meeting/Email/Update

When you work with multiple people on a team it’s hard to keep them all up to date with everything that is going on. Regular status updates, either in person or via VC, email can help with that. As we have multiple engineers working on SEO at the same time they can already get behind on what’s going on easily. That’s why on a weekly basis we send out updates on the work that they’ve done to the organization but also to the the bigger team. With this it’ makes it easier to show progress, list down what we’re planning on working on and provide early results. So things that we list in the email are:

  • Experiments started/finished: Do we have any results, or what did we launch this week?
  • What did we do last week? What are the tickets that we worked on, what kind of early results do we have, is this already being picked up by a search engine?
  • What are we going to work on this week? What issues will we work on, what kind of results might that provide, why do we work on this.
  • What did we learn last week? What kind of results die we see, what kind of growth did we achieve.

Monthly Updates

On top of that we send some headlines once a month for the bigger projects that we launched so we know what kind of progress we have made for the quarterly targets that we have. This will give a more birds eye view on what we’re achieving and if that’s on track with what we planned upfront. It’s a similar update to the Monthly one, but a bit more high level and readable for the whole team and people that don’t work with SEO on a day to day basis.

What’s next?

This is still not good enough, even when you have internal support you always have new questions rise and even when they all support you it’s probably going to happen that they start asking deeper questions that you need to keep explaining. This is something I now endure, questions basically are more relevant to your own work. Which is awesome, as it makes up for great debates that in the end will only improve products and SEO strategy. Even better, this will all help streamline the process of SEO and usually speed up the output.

What is SEO Experimentation?

What is SEO Experimentation?

Last updated on November 4th, 2018 at 10:45 pm

If you’ve been reading some of my blog posts in the past you’ll have noticed that I worked a lot on analytics, experimentation, and SEO. Having been able to combine these areas together has led to the point that for both Postmates and The Next Web previously, we worked on setting up a framework for SEO Experimentation. In my opinion, over time you’d like to learn more about what Google appreciates and how it can help you future wise, to think about what you should be focusing your attention on == prioritization. Lately, I read a blog post on the SEMrush blog with the title: SEO Experiments that will blow your mind (clickbait alert! so I won’t link to it). Hoping there would be a lot of great ideas in that blog post I started reading realizing that over 50% of examples weren’t even close to being an experiment. They were just research, from over a year ago (which was alarming too!).

Which pushed me to write this essay to tell you more about what SEO experimentation really is and how you can learn more about it as it’s still a relatively new area in SEO that is only been explored and exposed by a few big companies.

Update: since the original publication date I’ve become even more excited about SEO Experimentation and its possibilities. That’s why I’ve updated this post with more information and some frequently asked questions that I get about the subject.
Last update: November 4, 2018 – Added an additional resource from the Airbnb Team.

What really is, SEO Experimentation?

You’re testing 2-X variations of a template on your site (all product pages, all category pages) and measure over a period of time what the impact is in organic search traffic of the pages (usually a template) that have seen changes in your experiment. You want to isolate your changes as much as possible, you set a certain level of significance and you calculate in a mathematical way how your results have changed in the period before and after the change.

It’s not:

  • Research (I  compare data between periods too, but it doesn’t make it an experiment).
  • Guesswork: I’ve seen my pageviews go up with X% after optimizing my title on this page.

I would encourage you to also read this post on Moz by Will Critchlow in which he shared how they built Distilled ODN (we worked with their platform when I was at TNW) and how you can be testing with SEO yourself.

How is SEO Experimentation different from user testing?

Measurement: Instead of measuring conversion rates or other business metrics you’re mostly focused on tracking the number of sessions that are coming in from organic search. If the variants that you’ve worked on increase you’ll start calculating the impact on this. On the side, you’re still making sure that the conversion rate of these pages doesn’t decline as, in the end, it will still be the business metrics that will count.

Bucketing: Instead of bucketing users and sending user A into bucket A you’re doing this with pages. In the end, you want to make sure that the same pages (just like you do with users) end up in the same bucket. How you usually do that is that you sort by alphabet or category to have some kind of logic. What’s important though is to make sure that these buckets are in balance. Which is harder than you would do with user testing.

The difference between bucketing for users experimentation and SEO experiments
Bucketing works differently with SEO Experimentation

What are some examples of SEO Experiments?

Examples of things that you could be testing? Let’s list a few examples that I can think of:

  • Updating Title tags: does a certain keyword help, do I need to make them longer/shorter?
  • Adding/Removing Schema.org, what is the impact of adding structured data?
  • Adding content: does adding more content to a page help with its ranking? What if I add an additional heading to my content.
  • Internal link structures: do you want to add more relevant links to other pages?
  • Testing Layouts, what layout does help better for the SEO on this page? Ever noticed why Amazon has so many different product pages 😉

How do I start doing SEO Experimentation?

Let me give you a very much shortened and a simplified idea of how an SEO experiment works:

  1. Think about what you want to be testing (adding descriptions, setting a canonical), write down a hypothesis, we’ll talk about this shortly. 
  2. Figure out if you have enough traffic (500+ per variation per day) would be a minimum I’d say.
  3. Figure out how you can serve different content/HTML per page. Are you able to serve different areas on your site based on a randomized factor, still making sure that your buckets are just as big (50/50)?
  4. Setup the experiment and let it run for as long as needed to see valid results (usually at least 3-4+ weeks). You want to make sure that Google has picked up on all the changes on your page and has re-indexed the impacted pages.
  5. Analyze the results after this period and look at how these buckets of pages performed before your experiment and after. Are these results valid, you didn’t make any other changes to these pages in the meantime? Are the results per variant significant?
  6. You have found the winner + loser is. Time to start iterating and launch another experiment.

How to document an SEO Experiment?

You want to make sure that what you do around SEO experimentation is well documented, this will help you in the future with figuring out what kind of experiments are working and what you learned. When you can run over 25 experiments a year you probably won’t know after a year how many of these were successful and how to interpret the results. For documenting SEO experiments I’ve created a template that we filled in with the data on the actual experiment.  You can find it here and copy it in your own Google Drive for own use:

How to analyze an SEO Experiment?

You want to make sure before an SEO experiment is running that you know what has happened with it before it starts. It’s basically the ‘control’, you want to make sure your bucket is providing stable results so you can clearly analyze the difference when the new variants are being launched.

Creating buckets for SEO Experimentation
Bucketing needs to ensure that there are additional buckets so you can measure the baseline and take care of anomalies in your data sets.

Bucketing: Your bucketing needs to make sure that it’s sending the right variant to your analytics account (most often used: Google Analytics). When the experiment starts, make an annotation so you know from when you start analyzing the results.

Logs: Logs can come into play when you start analyzing the results. In most cases, your experiment won’t generate results in the first week as the changes in your variant haven’t been picked up in the experiment. That’s why you want to look at your log files to ensure that the new variants have been crawled.

Measuring & Analyzing impact: For measuring the impact you’re segmenting down the buckets and measure what happened before the experiment and after. To see if the changes are significant or not, you need to rely on the CausalImpact library to see what has happened or not. You want to send the data for different buckets in a way that can be visualized like this:

Sending dataLayer events for measuring SEO experiments
Send data about the buckets and elements (de)activated to web analytics

Anomalies: Analyze your buckets individually! Do you see any spikes in traffic that might be hurting the data quality? You need to be sure that is not the case. For example, what if one of the buckets contain pages about political topics that all of a sudden see a spike in search volume. This doesn’t mean that your page has been performing better, it means there was just more demand so the data for that variant might be invalid.


Examples of SEO Experiments

As I mentioned both at The Next Web and Postmates I was responsible for running SEO experiments. Most of them were around optimizing <title> tags. As changes to this have, in most cases, a direct connection to the CTR within the SERPS. The title is, in the end, used as the headline for a specific search result. So let me walk you through an example of an SEO experiment as we ran it at Postmates.

Updating Titles with additional keywords

The problem: We noticed a lot of search traffic for terms around food delivery in which a zip code, like 91615 was mentioned. As we could ‘easily’ create pages for zip codes we wanted to know if that was worth it, so: “What can we do to drive more additional searches around zip codes without building new landing pages and wasting valuable engineering resources doing so”.

The solution: As we knew for restaurants in what specific zip codes they were active we had the ability to mention the zip code in the title. As we were doing this across tens of thousands of restaurants we knew that we had enough of a sample size.

  • Old:
    • {Restaurant Name} {Street Address} in ({City}} – Postmates On-Demand Delivery
    • Paxti’s Pizza 176 Fillmore Street in San Francisco – Postmates On-Demand Delivery
  • New:
    • {Restaurant Name} {Street Address} in ({City}} ({Zip Code}) – Postmates On-Demand Delivery
    • Paxti’s Pizza 176 Fillmore Street in San Francisco (97521) – Postmates On-Demand Delivery

The result: It was inconclusive, in the end, that wasn’t likely the outcome that you were hoping for. But I want to paint a realistic picture of what can happen when you run experiments. In a lot of cases, you don’t see enough changes in the data to be certain that it’s an improvement. In this case, we expected that a title change wasn’t good enough to actually compete for zip code related queries. The food delivery industry is one of the most competitive in the world for SEO so we knew it was always possible to have an outcome like this.


Frequently Asked Questions + Answers

There are a lot of questions that come up when I talk about this subject with people. So I’ll try to keep up this blog post with any new questions that might arise:

Isn’t this cloaking? Doesn’t this hurt for my Google rankings?

Not really, you’re not changing anything based on who’s looking at the page. You’re changing this only on certain pages that are being served and the search engine + user will see the same thing. Ever looked at Amazon’s product pages and wonder why they all have a different layout? Because they’re testing for both user experience as SEO.

Do you want to learn more about this subject?

Great, when we were setting up our own SEO experimentation framework at Postmates about 6 months ago I tried to find all the articles related to it and talked to as many people as possible on this. These were mostly the articles I would refer you to if you want to learn more.

Resources

When I wanted to learn more about SEO experimentation I started to figure out what was already written on the web, most of these resources are from teams & companies that I worked with before. So if you’re enthusiastic about this subject, read more here:


Let’s really start innovating in the SEO industry and let’s get rid of terrible clickbait headlines. SEO Experimentation is like I mentioned something that we should be embracing as it’s a more scientific approach that is going to lead to finding new insights. If you want to talk more about this, feel free to reach out. Like I said, I have been updating this post for over 6+ months now, and will keep on doing so in the future.

Finding & Dealing with Related Keywords

Finding & Dealing with Related Keywords

Last updated on September 26th, 2018 at 04:47 am

How do you go from 1 keyword and find another 10.000 that might also be relevant to your business/site. One of the things that I’ve been thinking about and worked on for some sites recently. It’s fun as with smaller sites it makes it easy to get more insights into what an estimated size can be of an industry/niche that a company operates in. This ain’t rocket science and hopefully, after this blog posts, you’ll get some new ideas on how to deal with this.

How to get started?

Pick 1 keyword, preferably short-head: coffee mug, black rug, Tesla Roadster. They’re keywords that can create a good start for your keyword research as they’re more generic. In the research itself, we’ll talk about ways to get more insights into the long tail based on this 1 keyword.

From 1 to 10.000

Start finding related keywords for the keyword(s) you picked that you consider relevant. Use the tools that we’re going to talk about after this and repeat the process for all the keywords that you get back after the first run: 1 = 100 results = 10.000 results. Depending on the industry/niche that you operate in you might be able to find even more keywords using this method. When I started doing research for a coffee brand within 30 mins I ended up with data for 3 big niches within that space and over 25k keywords.

What tools are out there?

Obviously, you can’t do this without any tools. For my own research, I use the tools that are listed beneath. They’re a mix of different tools but they have the same output eventually. Getting to know more keywords but at the same time also get different input on intent. Focused on search (I’m looking for.. {topic_name}) and other search intent (I have a question around {topic_name}).

Besides the tools that I’ve listed there are many more that you could be using that I want you to benefit from:

    • Google Adwords Keyword Tool: The best source for related keywords by a keyword.
    • SEMRush: The second best source likely as they’re using all sorts of ways to figure out what keywords are related to each other. Also a big database of keywords.
    • AnswerThePublic: Depending on why/what/where/who you’re looking for AnswersThePublic can help you find keywords that are related to a user question.

Suggested Searches:

    • Google, Bing, Yahoo: The biggest search engines in the world are all using different ways to calculate related searches through their suggestions. So they’re all worth looking into.
    • Google Trends: Is a keyword trending or not and what keywords are related to a trending topic. Mostly useful when you’re going after topics that might have (had) some popularity.
    • YouTube: Everything video related, need I say more.
    • Wikipedia: You really are looking for some in-depth information in the topic, Wikipedia can likely tell you more about the topic and the related topics that are out there.
    • Instagram: Everything related to pictures and keywords, their hashtags might mislead you from time to time.
    • Reddit: The weirdest place to find keywords and topics.
    • Quora: Users have questions, you can answer them. The most popular questions on Quora on a topic are usually the biggest questions on your customer’s minds too.
    • Yahoo Answers: Depending on the keyword the data can be a bit old, who still uses Yahoo? But it can be useful to get the real hardcore keywords with a question intent.
    • Synonyms: The easiest relevance, find the keywords that have the same intention.
    • Amazon: Find keywords that people are using in a more transactional intent and that you might search for when you’re looking for a product. Great for e-commerce.

Grouping Keywords

When you’ve found your related keyword data set it’s time for the second phase, grouping them together. In the end, 1 keyword never comes alone and there is a ton you can do with them if you group them together in a way that makes sense for you….

By name/relevance/topical: Doing this at scale is hard, but I’m pretty sure that you see the similarity between the keywords: coffee mug and: black coffee mug. In both ‘coffee mug’ is the keyword that is overlapping (bigram). If you start splitting up keywords with different words relatively fast you’re able to find the top words and word combinations that your audience is using most. If you’re wanting to find out more on how to group them, check out KeywordClarity.io where you can group keywords together based on word groupings.

By keyword volume: If you have the right setup you can retrieve the keyword volumes for all of these keywords and start bucketing the keywords together based on short-head and the long tail. This will enable you to get better insights into the total size of the volume in your industry/niche.

By ranking/ aka opportunity: It would be great if you can combine your keywords with data from rankings. So you know what opportunity is and for what words you’re still missing out on some additional search volume.

What’s next?

Did you read the last part? What if you would start combining all three ways of grouping them? In that case, you’ll get more insights into the opportunity, your current position in the group and what kind of topical content you should be serving your audience. Food for thought for future blog posts around this topic.

Using Keyword Rankings In SEO

A few weeks ago I gave a talk at an SEO Meetup in San Francisco. It was a great opportunity to get some more feedback on a product/tool that I’m working on (and that we are already using at Postmates). You’ll hear more on this in the upcoming months (hopefully). In a previous blog post at TNW I talked about using dozens of GBs of data to get better insights in search performance. Over the last years I kept working on the actual code around this to also provide myself with more insights into the world around a set of keywords.

Because billions of searches are done on a daily basis and ~20% of queries haven’t been searched for in the past 30-90 days it means that there is always something new to find out. I’m on the hunt to explore these new keyword areas/segment & opportunities as fast as possible to get an idea on how important they can be.

That means two things:

  1. The keyword might be absolutely new and has never been searched for.
  2. The keyword has never come up on the radar of the company, it was never a related keyword or never got an impression simply because content didn’t rank for it.

Usually the next thing you want to know is what their ranking is so you can start improving on it, obviously that can be done in thousands of ways. But hopefully the process would usually work something like this. Moving up from an insane ranking (read: nowhere to be found) to the first position within a dozen weeks (don’t we all wish that can happen in that amount of time?).

Obviously what you’re looking for is hopefully a graph for a keyword that will look something like this:

What am I talking about?

Back at TNW my team was tracking 30.000 keywords on a weekly basis to get better insights into what was happening with our search volume & our rankings. It has multiple benefits:

  1. Get insights into your own performance for specific keywords.
  2. Get insights in your actual performance in search engines (are 100 keywords increasing/stable/decreasing?).
  3. Get insights into your competitors performance.

Besides that there is a great opportunity to learn more about the flux/delta of changes in the search results. You’re likely familiar with Mozcast & SERPMetrics Flux and other ‘weather’ radars that monitor the flux in rankings for tons of keywords to see what is changing and if they’re noticing an update. With your own toolset you’ll be able to get insights into that immediately. I started thinking about this whole concept years ago after this Mozcon talk from Martin McDonald in 2013. One of the things that are particularly interesting:

Share of Voice

You’ve also likely heard of the concept of Share of Voice in search. In this case we’re talking about it in the concept of rankings. If you rank #100 in the search results, you’ll get 1 point. If you’ll rank #1 you would assign it 100 points. Which basically means that you will get more points the higher you’ll rank. If you bundle all the keywords together, let’s say 100 you can get: 100 x 100 = 10.000 in total. Over time this will help you to see how a lot of rankings will be influenced and where you’re growing instead of being focused on just the rankings of 1 keyword (always a bad idea in my opinion).

In addition to measuring this for yourself, there will also be other useful ways you can use Share of Voice:

  • Who are my competitors: Obviously you know your direct competitors, but most of the times that doesn’t mean that they’re the same as you’re going against in search results. Get the top 10-20-50-100 (whatever works for you) and count the URLs for the same domain in all of the keywords in a group and multiply that by their Share of Voice. The ones that raise to the top will be the competitors that are annoying you most.
  • Competitors: You’re familiar now with the concept, so if you apply the same thing to your competitors you’re able to figure out how they’re growing compared to you and what their coverage is in search for a set of keywords. Basically providing you with the data you otherwise would have to dig up somewhere else.

How can you combine it with other data sets?

In a future blog posts I’m hoping to tell you more about how to do the actual work to connect your data to other sets in order for it to make sense. But the heading I’m going for right now is to also look more at competitors/ or at least other people in the same space. There is probably a big overlap with them but there also will be a lot of keywords missing.

What’s next?

I’m nearing the end of the first alpha version to use, it will enable users to track their rankings wherever they want. Don’t dozens of tools already do that? Yes! I’m just trying to make the process more useful for bigger companies and provide users with more opportunities to expand their keyword arsenal. All with the goal to increase innovation in this space and to lower costs. It doesn’t have to be expensive to track thousands of keywords whenever you want.

Measuring SEO Progress: From Start to Finish – Part 2: From Creation to Getting Links

Measuring SEO Progress: From Start to Finish – Part 2: From Creation to Getting Links

How to measure (and over time forecast) the impact of features that you’re building for SEO and how to measure this from start to finish. In this series I already provided some more information on how to measure progress: from creation to traffic (part 1). This blog post (part 2) will go deeper into another aspect of SEO: getting more links and how you can measure the impact of that. We’ll go a bit more into depth on how you can easily (through 4 steps, 1 bonus step) get insights into the links that you’ve acquired and how to measure their impact.

1. Launch

You’ve spent a lot of time writing a new article or working on a new feature/product with your team, so the last thing you want is not to receive search traffic for it and not start ranking. For most keywords you’ll need to do some additional authority building to make sure you’ll get the love that you might be needing. But it’s going to be important to keep track of what’s happening around that to measure the impact of your links on your organic search traffic.

2. Monitor

So the first thing you’d like to know if your new page is getting any links, there are multiple ways to track this. For this you can use the regular link research tools, that we’ll talk about more in depth later in this piece. But one of the easiest ways for a link to show real impact is to figure out if you’re receiving traffic from it and when that time was. Just simple and easy to figure out in Google Analytics. Head to the traffic sources report and see for that specific page if you’re getting any referral traffic. Is that the case? Then try to figure out when the first visit was, you’ll be able to monitor more closely then since when you’ll have this link or look at the obvious thing, the published date if you can find it.

How to measure success?

Google Alerts, Mention, Just-Discovered Links (Moz) and as described Google Analytics. They’re are all tools that can be used to identify links that are coming in and might be relatively new. As they’re mentions in the news media or just the newest being picked up by a crawler. It’s important to know more about that as you don’t’ want to be dependent on a link index that is updating on an irregular basis.

3. Analyze

Over a longer period of time you want to know how your authority through links is increasing. While I’m not a huge fan of the ‘core metrics’ like Domain Authority, Page Authority, etc. as they can change without providing any context I rather look at the graphs and new and incoming root domains to see how fast that is growing. In the end it is a numbers game (usually more quality + quantity) so that’s the best way to see it. One of my favorite reports in Majestic is the cumulated links + domains so I can get an easy grasp of what’s happening. Are you rapidly growing up and to the right or is progress slow?

How to measure success?

One suggestion that I would have is to look at the cached pages for your links: So by now you’ve figured out what kind of links are sending traffic, so that’s a good first sign. But are they also providing any value for your SEO? Put the actual link into Google and see if the page is being indexed + cached. It is? Good for you, that means the page is of good enough quality and being cached for Google’s sake. It’s not, hmm then there is work to do for no and your actual page might need some authority boosting on its own.

4. Impact

Are you links really impacting what’s happening to the authority and ranking of the page. You would probably want to know. It’s one of the harder tasks to figure out as you have a lot of variables that can be playing a role in this. It’s basically a combination of the value of these links, which you could use one of the link research tools’ metrics for or just looking at the actual changes for search traffic for your landing page. Do you see any changes there?

5. Collect all the Links

In addition to getting insights into what kind of links might be impacting your rankings for a page you’ll likely want to know where all of your links can be find. That’s relatively simple, it’s just a matter of connecting all the tools together and using them in the most efficient way.

So sign up for at least the first three tools, as Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools are free, you can use them to download your link profiles. When you sign up for Majestic you’re able to verify your account with your GSC account and get access to your own data when you connect your properties. So you just unlocked three ways of getting more data.

That’s still not enough? Think about getting a (paid) account at three other services so you can download their data and combine it with the previous data sets, you’re not going to be able to retrieve much more data and get a better overview as you’re now leveraging 6 different indexes.

(P.S. Take notice that all of them grow their indexes over time, a growing link profile might not always mean that you’re getting more links, it might be that they’re just getting better at finding them.)

How to measure success?

Download all the data on a regular basis (weekly, monthly, quarterly) and combine the data sets, as they’re all providing links and root domains you can easily add the sheets together and remove the duplicate values. You won’t have all the metrics per domain + link that way but still can get a pretty good insight into what your most popular linking root domains + links are.
In the previous part I talked more about measuring the impact from creation to getting traffic. Hopefully the next part will provide more information on how to measure business impact & potentially use the data for forecasting. In the end when you merge all these different areas you should be able to measure impact in any stage independently. What steps did I miss in this analysis and could use some more clarification?